Community Specialist Stop Smoking Service
A practical guide to understanding what the buyer really wants and how to build a winning response.
The goal isn't just to stop smoking
When I look at this tender, I see something beyond the surface.
Newcastle City Council isn't simply looking for a service to help people quit smoking.
They're looking for a partner who can create lasting change in the community's health and wellbeing.
If I were writing this bid, I'd focus on the broader impact of the service — reducing health inequalities, improving quality of life and supporting long-term behavioural change.
The contract covers a comprehensive Stop Smoking Service for the North East, valued at £1,659,000 over 900 days.
Think about the people who need this service
This isn't just about numbers or statistics.
It's about real people in the community who need support to make a change that's incredibly difficult.
I'd be thinking about the diverse needs of smokers in Newcastle.
Different age groups, socio-economic backgrounds and cultural contexts all play a role in how support should be tailored.
If I were evaluating bids, I'd want to see how you plan to understand and address these varied needs.
Pay attention to what they say
Newcastle City Council's focus is clear.
They want a service that not only helps people quit but also prevents relapses and supports sustained abstinence.
They are not just looking for an initial impact but a long-term transformation.
I'd build my submission around demonstrating a robust follow-up support system and strategies for relapse prevention.
Evidence always beats promises
One thing I noticed when I worked in the public sector was that evidence is king.
Every bidder will promise excellent service, but few will prove it.
If I were writing this response, I'd include:
- Case studies of past successes in similar communities
- Testimonials from service users
- Data on long-term quit rates you've achieved
- Examples of innovative techniques that have worked
Consistency is crucial
Over 900 days, it's not just about starting strong.
It's about maintaining that level of service consistently throughout the contract term.
I'd want to see plans for staffing stability, ongoing training and how you manage any unexpected challenges.
What happens during staff absences or when demand spikes?
That's what I'd want to know.
Don't underestimate the local context
Newcastle has its own unique challenges and opportunities.
If I were crafting this bid, I'd make sure to show a deep understanding of the local health landscape.
How does smoking prevalence in Newcastle compare to national averages?
What local partnerships can you leverage to enhance the service delivery?
How you'll make life easier for the Council
Running a contract like this isn't easy.
Newcastle City Council will want a partner who reduces their workload, not adds to it.
I'd focus on how my management processes streamline communication, reporting and problem resolution.
Show your commitment to innovation
Stopping smoking is a constantly evolving field.
The Council will be looking for a provider who stays ahead of the curve with new methods and technologies.
I'd highlight any innovative approaches or tools you plan to use, from digital support to new behavioural science techniques.
Common mistakes
Avoid submissions that:
- Fail to demonstrate a clear understanding of local needs
- Overpromise without evidence to back it up
- Neglect the importance of long-term support and relapse prevention
- Ignore the need for consistent service delivery over the contract term
- Lack detail on innovative approaches or adaptation to new methods
- Overlook the complexity of managing a diverse client base
- Fail to address how you'll handle staffing and resource challenges
- Assume standard solutions will fit unique local contexts
My Final Thoughts
Newcastle City Council is looking for more than just a Stop Smoking Service.
They want a transformative partner who understands the community and can deliver lasting health improvements.
With a contract value of £1,659,000 and a duration of 900 days, quality will be as critical as the price.
The emphasis on long-term impact means your written submission must showcase your ability to deliver not just immediate results but sustained change.
Thanks for reading.
I hope this guide has helped make public procurement feel a little less daunting. If it has, then it's done its job.
P.S. Got a question?
If you've got a question about anything you've read, or you're stuck on a tender, just send me an email.
Whether it's a quick question or you simply need pointing in the right direction, I'm always happy to help if I can.
Ready to decide whether this contract is worth bidding?
View the opportunity on Bid Trawler and access everything you need to make an informed decision, including the full tender information, direct access to the tender documents, the current supplier, who's winning similar contracts, who else may be bidding, buyer intelligence, our exclusive Inside View, your personalised Winnability Score and an AI-powered contract review.
View the Full Contract & Exclusive Inside View on Bid Trawler →About our "How to Win This Contract" guides
Our guides are written using publicly available procurement information, including contract notices and published tender documents where available. They are designed to help suppliers understand the buyer's likely priorities and think more strategically about their approach. They are not based on any bidder's confidential submission, bespoke bid strategy or non-public procurement information.