Escalator and Lift Maintenance and Repair

Kim Frater, founder of Bid Trawler
Written by Kim Frater
Former Public Sector Buyer • Founder of Bid Trawler • 40+ years' public sector experience
"I believe public procurement shouldn't be complicated. Every guide I write explains the process in plain English so you can bid with confidence."

2 minute read  •  Updated September 2026

A practical guide to understanding what the buyer really wants and how to build a winning response.

It's Not Just About Maintenance

When I first read this tender, one thing stood out to me.

Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (SPT) isn't just looking for someone to maintain and repair escalators and lifts.

They're looking for a partner who can ensure reliability and safety across their entire estate.

This contract covers all Subway stations, Bus Stations and Corporate Offices.

It's a massive responsibility.

And it's more about ensuring public safety and operational efficiency than just mechanics.

Think About the People Using These Services

Consider who relies on these escalators and lifts.

Commuters, staff, visitors.

They all depend on these systems to be operational every day.

If an escalator breaks down during rush hour, it can cause significant delays.

If I were evaluating bids, I'd be looking for a company that understands the importance of minimising disruptions.

Not just fixing problems when they arise.

Evidence Always Beats Promises

One thing I noticed when I worked in the public sector was that almost every bidder claimed to deliver an excellent service.

Very few proved it.

If you have evidence, use it.

  • Case studies of similar work
  • Testimonials from past clients
  • Data on response times and resolution rates
  • Examples of proactive maintenance strategies

These will all help your bid stand out.

Pay Attention to What They Say

SPT has made it clear.

They're not just interested in the lowest price.

They want value for money.

This means your quality submission has to be strong.

You need to demonstrate how you'll provide a reliable service over the 1800 days of the contract.

That's what I'd build my submission around.

Don't Forget About Emergency Repairs

This is something I think suppliers often overlook.

Every system can fail unexpectedly.

What matters is how quickly and effectively you can respond.

I'd want to see exactly what happens when someone calls in sick or if there's a sudden equipment failure.

Make sure you detail your emergency repair protocol.

Remember Consistency is Key

One thing I'd keep reminding myself is the importance of consistency.

Over a contract term of this length, maintaining the same high standards is challenging.

Staffing.

Not equipment.

Not chemicals.

SPT will want to know how you plan to handle absences, annual leave and any recruitment challenges.

Show How You'll Make Life Easier for SPT

Every contract creates work for the client.

The best contractors reduce that workload.

If I were writing this tender, I'd be explaining how my management processes make life easier for SPT.

Outline how your reporting systems and communication plans streamline their operations.

Common Mistakes

Avoid submissions that:

  • Focus only on technical details and ignore user impact
  • Lack evidence of past successful maintenance contracts
  • Ignore the importance of emergency response protocols
  • Promise low costs without detailing how quality will be maintained
  • Fail to address staff continuity and training
  • Overlook the significance of communication with the client

My Final Thoughts

Strathclyde Partnership for Transport is looking for reassurance.

They want to know that whoever wins this contract will keep their lifts and escalators running smoothly.

They've made it clear that value is more important than just cost.

With a contract duration of 1800 days, maintaining consistent service is critical.

The emphasis on quality means your written submission carries significant weight.

Focus on reliability, evidence and how you’ll handle the unexpected.

That's how you'll stand out.

Thanks for reading.

I hope this guide has helped make public procurement feel a little less daunting. If it has, then it's done its job.

Kim
Founder, Bid Trawler

P.S. Got a question?

If you've got a question about anything you've read, or you're stuck on a tender, just send me an email.

Whether it's a quick question or you simply need pointing in the right direction, I'm always happy to help if I can.

kim@bidtrawler.com

Ready to decide whether this contract is worth bidding?

View the opportunity on Bid Trawler and access everything you need to make an informed decision, including the full tender information, direct access to the tender documents, the current supplier, who's winning similar contracts, who else may be bidding, buyer intelligence, our exclusive Inside View, your personalised Winnability Score and an AI-powered contract review.

View the Full Contract & Exclusive Inside View on Bid Trawler →
About our "How to Win This Contract" guides

Our guides are written using publicly available procurement information, including contract notices and published tender documents where available. They are designed to help suppliers understand the buyer's likely priorities and think more strategically about their approach. They are not based on any bidder's confidential submission, bespoke bid strategy or non-public procurement information.

More live contract guides

See all guides