High-Throughput Experimentation (HTE) Software for Drug Discovery
A practical guide to understanding what the buyer really wants and how to build a winning response.
The biggest clue in this tender isn't the software
When I look at this tender, I see something important.
The University of Dundee isn't just buying software.
They’re buying a way to accelerate their drug discovery process.
High-Throughput Experimentation (HTE) is about "multi-parameter optimisation" and "synthesis of multiple compounds".
This isn't just about technology.
It's about transforming how they work.
The contract covers software development and implementation for a period of 1440 days, valued at £210,000.
Think about the scientists using it
This isn't just software for IT specialists.
It's a tool for researchers and scientists.
They're the ones who will depend on it to speed up their research.
So, your solution needs to be intuitive, user-friendly and seamlessly integrate into existing workflows.
I'd focus on how the software simplifies the Design, Make, Test and Analyse (DMTA) cycle.
Pay attention to what they say
The University of Dundee highlights the importance of "Direct-to-Biology (D2B) approaches".
This means they want quicker access to biological data by testing non-purified mixtures.
Your response should clearly demonstrate how the software supports this approach.
How does your software enable faster data acquisition and analysis?
That's what they're interested in.
Evidence always beats promises
One thing I learned in my years in the public sector is that evidence speaks louder than words.
Don't just tell them your software is great.
Show them.
- Provide case studies where your software improved research timelines
- Share testimonials from similar institutions or companies
- Offer data or metrics that demonstrate effectiveness
- Highlight any awards or recognitions your software has received
Evidence builds trust.
Don't underestimate integration
The success of this project depends on how well your software integrates with existing systems.
Researchers don't want to learn a whole new system.
They want something that fits into what they already do.
I'd recommend detailing your experience with similar integrations.
Explain any customisation options you offer to ensure a smooth transition.
Standards over the whole term
Consistency is vital.
Over the 1440 days, your software must remain reliable and up-to-date.
Think about updates, support and training.
How will you ensure the software stays relevant and effective?
I'd include a plan for regular updates and user training sessions.
Remember who you're trying to convince
The ultimate goal here is to make life easier for scientists at the University of Dundee.
Your software should aim to reduce their workload, not add to it.
Consider how your project management and customer support will alleviate pressures on their team.
That's what I'd highlight in your submission.
Common mistakes
Avoid submissions that:
- Focus too much on technical jargon instead of practical application
- Fail to provide evidence of successful past implementations
- Overlook the importance of user experience for researchers
- Neglect to address integration with existing systems
- Promise features without outlining how they will be delivered
- Ignore the emphasis on Direct-to-Biology approaches
- Lack a clear plan for updates and ongoing support
My Final Thoughts
At its core, this tender is about improving the efficiency of drug discovery through better technology.
The University of Dundee is investing £210,000 over 1440 days for a software solution that truly integrates into their scientific process.
With the right focus on user needs, integration and evidence, your submission can stand out.
Remember, the quality of your written response will carry significant weight.
Thanks for reading.
I hope this guide has helped make public procurement feel a little less daunting. If it has, then it's done its job.
P.S. Got a question?
If you've got a question about anything you've read, or you're stuck on a tender, just send me an email.
Whether it's a quick question or you simply need pointing in the right direction, I'm always happy to help if I can.
Ready to decide whether this contract is worth bidding?
View the opportunity on Bid Trawler and access everything you need to make an informed decision, including the full tender information, direct access to the tender documents, the current supplier, who's winning similar contracts, who else may be bidding, buyer intelligence, our exclusive Inside View, your personalised Winnability Score and an AI-powered contract review.
View the Full Contract & Exclusive Inside View on Bid Trawler →About our "How to Win This Contract" guides
Our guides are written using publicly available procurement information, including contract notices and published tender documents where available. They are designed to help suppliers understand the buyer's likely priorities and think more strategically about their approach. They are not based on any bidder's confidential submission, bespoke bid strategy or non-public procurement information.