Highways – Audit & Asset Management (A&AM) Contract

Kim Frater, founder of Bid Trawler
Written by Kim Frater
Former Public Sector Buyer • Founder of Bid Trawler • 40+ years' public sector experience
"I believe public procurement shouldn't be complicated. Every guide I write explains the process in plain English so you can bid with confidence."

3 minute read  •  Updated September 2026

A practical guide to understanding what the buyer really wants and how to build a winning response.

Don't Overlook the Independence Requirement

This tender is unique because it hinges on independence.

Westminster City Council isn't just looking for a firm to audit and manage assets.

They're looking for a partner who can provide objective scrutiny, assurance and challenge, all while remaining independent from the current Highways & Public Realm contractor.

That separation is crucial.

The contract involves a mix of audit services, asset management and professional services, all supporting the Council's Highways & Public Realm contract.

Think Beyond Compliance

Most bidders will talk about their ability to audit performance and compliance.

While that's important, it's only part of the picture.

The Council is also interested in commercial and cost assurance, technical assurance and responsible procurement.

They want a partner who can audit performance information, review estimates and final accounts and ensure compliance with industry standards.

But they also need someone who can think strategically about asset management and procurement.

Pay Attention to What They Say

The buyer is clear about their priorities.

They need a supplier who can deliver an Audit Plan within a month of the contract starting and draft plans each March thereafter.

Monthly Performance Reports and an annual Innovation Report are non-negotiable.

They want to see at least five improvement opportunities identified each year, with clear financial, carbon and customer benefits.

If I were writing this tender, I'd make sure to address each of these requirements explicitly.

Evidence Always Beats Promises

If I were evaluating bids, I'd be looking for evidence over promises.

The Council will want to see:

  • Examples of previous audits you've conducted
  • Details of asset management strategies you've developed
  • Evidence of your ability to use IT solutions like CAMS and HMMS
  • Case studies showing successful carbon reduction initiatives

Promising excellence isn't enough. You need to prove it.

Remember the Human Element

Yes, this is a technical contract.

But it impacts real people.

The Council's decision will affect the quality of highways and public spaces in Westminster.

Think about how your work will contribute to the community.

How will you ensure that the highways and public realm in Westminster are managed effectively and sustainably?

That's what I'd keep reminding myself.

Show How You'll Make Life Easier for the Council

The best contractors reduce workload for their clients.

Explain how your management processes will make life easier for the Council.

If I were writing this tender, I'd detail how my team will handle the reporting requirements and communicate effectively with the Council.

It's about more than just getting the job done. It's about doing it in a way that supports the Council's goals.

Plan for Long-Term Consistency

This contract could extend to 31 March 2032.

Consistency over time is one of the biggest challenges.

I'd want to see how you plan to maintain high standards throughout the term.

How will you manage staffing, annual leave and sickness?

How will you ensure that your team can consistently deliver the quality and standards expected?

Don't Forget the Technology

The Council's IT solutions — CAMS, HMMS, BSMMS and CMS — are critical to this contract.

Showcase your ability to use these tools effectively.

How will they support your audit and asset management activities?

Make it clear that you're not just familiar with the technology, but that you can leverage it to deliver better outcomes.

Common Mistakes

Avoid submissions that:

  • Focus solely on audit without addressing asset management
  • Overlook the need for operational independence
  • Fail to provide evidence of past successes
  • Ignore the Council's reporting and improvement requirements
  • Underestimate the importance of using IT solutions
  • Neglect to demonstrate a plan for long-term consistency
  • Promise innovation without concrete examples
  • Forget the social and carbon-reduction elements of the contract

My Final Thoughts

This contract is about more than just audit and asset management.

It's about providing the Council with peace of mind.

Westminster City Council is looking for a partner who can be trusted to deliver objective scrutiny, assurance and challenge, while remaining independent and aligned with their goals.

With a contract value of £2,575,000 and a term that could extend to 2032, the stakes are high.

Quality will be a significant factor, given the Council's emphasis on detailed reporting and innovation.

Focus on delivering a submission that demonstrates your independence, strategic thinking and ability to make a real impact.

Thanks for reading.

I hope this guide has helped make public procurement feel a little less daunting. If it has, then it's done its job.

Kim
Founder, Bid Trawler

P.S. Got a question?

If you've got a question about anything you've read, or you're stuck on a tender, just send me an email.

Whether it's a quick question or you simply need pointing in the right direction, I'm always happy to help if I can.

kim@bidtrawler.com

Ready to decide whether this contract is worth bidding?

View the opportunity on Bid Trawler and access everything you need to make an informed decision, including the full tender information, direct access to the tender documents, the current supplier, who's winning similar contracts, who else may be bidding, buyer intelligence, our exclusive Inside View, your personalised Winnability Score and an AI-powered contract review.

View the Full Contract & Exclusive Inside View on Bid Trawler →
About our "How to Win This Contract" guides

Our guides are written using publicly available procurement information, including contract notices and published tender documents where available. They are designed to help suppliers understand the buyer's likely priorities and think more strategically about their approach. They are not based on any bidder's confidential submission, bespoke bid strategy or non-public procurement information.

More live contract guides

See all guides