IWM/2627/Exh/3511: IWM Exhibitions Build Framework Agreement

Kim Frater, founder of Bid Trawler
Written by Kim Frater
Former Public Sector Buyer • Founder of Bid Trawler • 40+ years' public sector experience
"I believe public procurement shouldn't be complicated. Every guide I write explains the process in plain English so you can bid with confidence."

3 minute read  •  Updated August 2026

A practical guide to understanding what the Imperial War Museums are really looking for and how to build a winning response.

This isn't just about building exhibitions

The Imperial War Museums (IWM) are looking for more than just exhibition builders.

They're seeking trusted partners who can deliver consistently high-quality, safe and cost-effective exhibition works across their estate.

The framework is split into two lots: projects under £200,000 and those over £200,000.

This division isn't just about size.

It's about capacity, capability and the technical expertise to deliver at different scales.

That's what I'd focus on.

Think about what makes an exhibition memorable

Yes, you'll be building exhibitions.

But what IWM is really buying is the visitor experience.

Every exhibition is a chance to tell a story, to engage and to educate.

If I were writing this tender, I'd show how my work enhances the visitor experience at every turn.

Don't underestimate the importance of safety and reliability

IWM's emphasis on safety and reliability is clear.

These are non-negotiables.

Every project must be completed safely, on time and within budget.

I'd want to demonstrate how my processes ensure this happens without fail.

Show your capability to handle different project sizes

Bidding for both lots?

You'll need to show you can handle projects of different scales.

For Lot 1, it's about agility and efficiency on smaller projects.

For Lot 2, it's about managing complexity and delivering on a larger scale.

I'd make sure my submission clearly outlines this capacity and capability.

Evidence always beats promises

One thing I noticed when I worked in the public sector was that almost every bidder claimed to deliver an excellent service.

Very few proved it.

If you have evidence, use it.

  • Case studies of past exhibitions
  • Client testimonials
  • Awards or recognitions
  • Safety records

These elements will strengthen your submission.

Pay attention to what they say

IWM is clear about the importance of experience and technical expertise.

They're looking for partners who can deliver high-quality work consistently.

If I were evaluating bids, I'd be looking for submissions that prove this with concrete examples.

Remember who you're trying to convince

Your audience isn't just procurement officers.

It's also the curators, the educators and the operational staff at IWM.

They want a partner who understands their mission and can help them achieve it.

That's what I'd keep in mind when writing my bid.

Consistency over the whole term

Winning a place on the framework is just the start.

Maintaining standards across the full three to four years is crucial.

I'd explain how I plan to ensure consistent quality, handle staff turnover and manage any unexpected challenges.

Common mistakes

Avoid submissions that:

  • Focus solely on the mechanics of building without mentioning visitor experience
  • Fail to demonstrate capacity and capability for both lots if bidding for both
  • Lack concrete evidence of past success
  • Overlook safety and reliability as top priorities
  • Assume that being shortlisted guarantees work
  • Ignore the specific requirements and mission of IWM
  • Provide generic responses not tailored to IWM's needs

My Final Thoughts

IWM is looking for partners who can deliver quality, safety and reliability across their estate.

This framework is valued at £3,000,000 and split into two lots based on project size.

The three-year term, with an option to extend for another year, means IWM is planning for the long haul.

The quality of your submission will be critical, especially since projects are evaluated separately for each lot.

Winning a place on this framework is just the beginning.

Ensuring you're the go-to provider for call-offs is the real prize.

Thanks for reading.

I hope this guide has helped make public procurement feel a little less daunting. If it has, then it's done its job.

Kim
Founder, Bid Trawler

P.S. Got a question?

If you've got a question about anything you've read, or you're stuck on a tender, just send me an email.

Whether it's a quick question or you simply need pointing in the right direction, I'm always happy to help if I can.

kim@bidtrawler.com

Ready to decide whether this contract is worth bidding?

View the opportunity on Bid Trawler and access everything you need to make an informed decision, including the full tender information, direct access to the tender documents, the current supplier, who's winning similar contracts, who else may be bidding, buyer intelligence, our exclusive Inside View, your personalised Winnability Score and an AI-powered contract review.

View the Full Contract & Exclusive Inside View on Bid Trawler →
About our "How to Win This Contract" guides

Our guides are written using publicly available procurement information, including contract notices and published tender documents where available. They are designed to help suppliers understand the buyer's likely priorities and think more strategically about their approach. They are not based on any bidder's confidential submission, bespoke bid strategy or non-public procurement information.

More live contract guides

See all guides