For the provision of a Higher Education Institution to deliver the Step Up to Social Work Programme for the East Midlands Regional Partnership (Cohorts 10 and 11)

Kim Frater, founder of Bid Trawler
Written by Kim Frater
Former Public Sector Buyer • Founder of Bid Trawler • 40+ years' public sector experience
"I believe public procurement shouldn't be complicated. Every guide I write explains the process in plain English so you can bid with confidence."

3 minute read  •  Updated September 2026

A practical guide to understanding what the buyer really wants and how to build a winning response.

The real focus isn't just education

When I look at this tender, it's clear that Derby City Council isn't just searching for a provider to run a training programme.

They're looking for a partner who can elevate the quality of social work in children's services across the East Midlands.

This contract, valued at £3,600,000, covers the delivery of the Step Up to Social Work Programme for two cohorts, beginning March 2027 and potentially extending to July 2031.

The programme isn't just about education.

It's about transforming how social work is delivered to vulnerable children and young people.

Think about what the council worries about

The council is concerned about more than just academic delivery.

They want assurance that the programme will attract high calibre candidates who can thrive in challenging environments.

Local Government Reorganisation (LGR) might affect council structures, but the council is clear that it shouldn't lead to increased service demand.

However, the possibility of novating the contract to a new entity means you need to demonstrate flexibility and adaptability.

Show how you'll maintain standards across the term

Consistency is key.

The council has highlighted their reliance on lessons learned from previous procurements and performance monitoring.

If I were writing this tender, I'd focus on how my institution plans to monitor and maintain high standards throughout the contract term.

That includes recruitment processes, quality assurance mechanisms and feedback loops.

Pay attention to what they say

One thing that stands out is the council's commitment to transparency and a level playing field.

They've deliberately avoided overly prescriptive requirements to ensure fairness.

This signals their openness to innovative delivery models.

It’s a chance to propose unique approaches that align with the programme's objectives while meeting the council's criteria.

Evidence always beats promises

From my experience, I know that claims are easy to make.

Proving them is harder.

The council has a history of performance monitoring and benchmarking, so they'll be looking for concrete evidence.

If you've delivered similar programmes, highlight your successes.

  • Case studies of past cohorts
  • Testimonials from previous participants
  • Quantifiable outcomes that match the programme's goals

Consider the broader impact

This programme is about more than just training social workers.

It's about contributing to the community by enhancing the skills of those who work with vulnerable groups.

I'd frame my response to show how our institution plans to support candidates beyond the classroom.

Think about mentorship programmes, ongoing support and alumni networks.

Prepare for organisational changes

Given the potential for the contract to be novated due to LGR, flexibility is crucial.

The council has stated that these changes shouldn't affect service demand, but they might affect contractual relationships.

I'd ensure my bid outlines how my institution can adapt to any shifts in council structures or responsibilities.

Don't overlook the importance of collaboration

The programme covers multiple councils within the East Midlands Regional Partnership.

Collaboration will be key to ensuring consistency across different regions.

I'd emphasise how my institution plans to work with all stakeholders involved.

Consider how you'll coordinate with various councils and align with their specific needs.

Common mistakes

Avoid submissions that:

  • Overlook the emphasis on candidate quality and programme outcomes
  • Fail to address potential impacts of Local Government Reorganisation
  • Neglect to demonstrate flexibility and adaptability
  • Provide generic responses without evidence of past successes
  • Ignore the council's focus on transparency and innovation
  • Lack a clear plan for collaboration across the partnership
  • Underestimate the importance of maintaining standards throughout the contract term

My Final Thoughts

Ultimately, Derby City Council is looking for more than just a service provider.

They want a partner who understands the transformative potential of the Step Up to Social Work Programme.

With a contract value of £3,600,000 and the possibility of extension to July 2031, the council is investing in long-term outcomes.

The programme's success hinges on quality, collaboration and adaptability — and that's where your written submission should shine.

Thanks for reading.

I hope this guide has helped make public procurement feel a little less daunting. If it has, then it's done its job.

Kim
Founder, Bid Trawler

P.S. Got a question?

If you've got a question about anything you've read, or you're stuck on a tender, just send me an email.

Whether it's a quick question or you simply need pointing in the right direction, I'm always happy to help if I can.

kim@bidtrawler.com

Ready to decide whether this contract is worth bidding?

View the opportunity on Bid Trawler and access everything you need to make an informed decision, including the full tender information, direct access to the tender documents, the current supplier, who's winning similar contracts, who else may be bidding, buyer intelligence, our exclusive Inside View, your personalised Winnability Score and an AI-powered contract review.

View the Full Contract & Exclusive Inside View on Bid Trawler →
About our "How to Win This Contract" guides

Our guides are written using publicly available procurement information, including contract notices and published tender documents where available. They are designed to help suppliers understand the buyer's likely priorities and think more strategically about their approach. They are not based on any bidder's confidential submission, bespoke bid strategy or non-public procurement information.

More live contract guides

See all guides