HR and Payroll

Kim Frater, founder of Bid Trawler
Written by Kim Frater
Former Public Sector Buyer • Founder of Bid Trawler • 40+ years' public sector experience
"I believe public procurement shouldn't be complicated. Every guide I write explains the process in plain English so you can bid with confidence."

3 minute read  •  Updated September 2026

A practical guide to understanding what Oxford City Council really wants and how to build a winning response.

Think about the whole picture

When you read the documents for this tender, it's easy to focus on the software aspect.

But remember, Oxford City Council isn't just buying a software solution.

They're buying efficiency, reliability and peace of mind for their HR and payroll processes.

This contract covers everything from HR management to payroll, recruitment, workforce management and employee self-service.

It's cloud-hosted and needs comprehensive implementation and support.

Pay attention to what they say

The council's emphasis on a "cloud-hosted SaaS" solution is significant.

They want a system that's scalable and future-proof.

They're clear about the need for a solution that integrates seamlessly with their existing processes.

This means your response should highlight flexibility and adaptability.

If I were evaluating bids, I'd look for how well a solution can adapt to changing needs over the years.

Don't just promise — prove it

Many bidders will say they can deliver a smooth implementation and robust support.

But evidence always beats promises.

If I were writing this tender, I'd include:

  • Case studies of similar successful implementations
  • Client testimonials
  • Performance metrics from previous projects
  • Certifications or industry recognition

This is where you can stand out.

Show you understand their worries

Think about what keeps the council's HR and payroll team up at night.

Errors in payroll, system downtime and complex transitions can cause major headaches.

Your submission should reassure them.

Explain how your solution minimises errors and what your contingency plans are for downtime.

Implementation isn't just a phase

It's a critical part of this contract.

The buyer will be looking closely at how you propose to manage the transition from their current systems to your solution.

Highlight your project management skills and experience with similar transitions.

Detail your approach to training their staff and ensuring a smooth handover.

Long-term support is key

This contract could last up to 10 years.

That's a long time to maintain a relationship.

Explain how you plan to support the council throughout the entire term.

Regular updates, ongoing training and responsive customer support will be crucial.

I'd want to see a clear plan for maintaining service quality over the long haul.

Think about the users

Ultimately, this system is for the people who will use it every day.

The council's HR team, payroll officers and employees.

Your response should speak to ease of use and accessibility.

Demonstrate how the system will make their jobs easier, not harder.

One thing I'd keep reminding myself

Remember, you're not just selling software.

You're offering a partnership.

A solution that will help the council run smoothly and efficiently.

Every response should circle back to this.

Highlight how your approach will align with their goals and help them achieve a seamless operation.

Common mistakes

Avoid submissions that:

  • Focus too heavily on technical specs without considering user needs
  • Lack evidence of past success
  • Overlook the importance of a comprehensive implementation plan
  • Ignore long-term support beyond initial setup
  • Fail to address potential risks and how you'll mitigate them
  • Assume the buyer will adapt to your system, rather than the other way around

My Final Thoughts

Oxford City Council is looking for a partner, not just a provider.

They need a solution that integrates seamlessly with existing processes and supports them for up to a decade.

Given the contract's value of £1,833,333 and potential duration of 10 years, it's clear they are investing in quality.

The weighting will likely favour those who can demonstrate a reliable, adaptable solution.

That's what I'd build my submission around.

Thanks for reading.

I hope this guide has helped make public procurement feel a little less daunting. If it has, then it's done its job.

Kim
Founder, Bid Trawler

P.S. Got a question?

If you've got a question about anything you've read, or you're stuck on a tender, just send me an email.

Whether it's a quick question or you simply need pointing in the right direction, I'm always happy to help if I can.

kim@bidtrawler.com

Ready to decide whether this contract is worth bidding?

View the opportunity on Bid Trawler and access everything you need to make an informed decision, including the full tender information, direct access to the tender documents, the current supplier, who's winning similar contracts, who else may be bidding, buyer intelligence, our exclusive Inside View, your personalised Winnability Score and an AI-powered contract review.

View the Full Contract & Exclusive Inside View on Bid Trawler →
About our "How to Win This Contract" guides

Our guides are written using publicly available procurement information, including contract notices and published tender documents where available. They are designed to help suppliers understand the buyer's likely priorities and think more strategically about their approach. They are not based on any bidder's confidential submission, bespoke bid strategy or non-public procurement information.

More live contract guides

See all guides