Provision of Corporate and Professional Services to Big Life Schools Multi Academy Trust

Kim Frater, founder of Bid Trawler
Written by Kim Frater
Former Public Sector Buyer • Founder of Bid Trawler • 40+ years' public sector experience
"I believe public procurement shouldn't be complicated. Every guide I write explains the process in plain English so you can bid with confidence."

3 minute read  •  Updated September 2026

A practical guide to understanding what the buyer really wants and how to build a winning response.

Don't get lost in the services

It's easy to see the list of ten service areas and think the buyer just wants a tick-box approach.

But what Big Life Schools is really buying is peace of mind.

They want a partner who can make the Trust run smoothly, so their leaders can focus on teaching.

The contract covers everything from financial and payroll services to managed procurement, ICT and estates management.

A single strategic partner will integrate these services, aligning them with the Trust’s goals.

That's the mindset you need to approach this tender with.

Think about the people leading the schools

School leaders are your end users.

They worry about efficiency, compliance and the safety of their pupils and staff.

They don't want to be bogged down by operational headaches.

If I were writing this tender, I'd address how my services will enable school leaders to concentrate on educational outcomes.

Make it clear how your support will empower them, not add more layers of complexity.

Integration is key

The Trust is looking for an integrated suite of services.

Not just separate solutions for each area.

I'd emphasise my ability to deliver a cohesive service that brings together strategic advice, operational delivery and performance management.

Show how you’ll ensure seamless communication between the different service areas.

And how you'll manage this integration through a single accountable management structure.

That's what will set you apart from other bidders.

Pay attention to what they say

The Trust spells out that they want services that are "reliable, compliant, responsive and strategically aligned".

They also mention the importance of "continuous improvement and innovation".

I'd build my submission around these themes.

Demonstrate how you’ll provide reliable and compliant services, and back it up with evidence of past performance.

Highlight your approach to innovation and how you plan to continuously improve the services over the contract term.

Evidence always beats promises

Promises are easy to make.

Evidence is what convinces.

If I were evaluating bids, I'd be looking for solid evidence of your capability in each service area.

  • Testimonials or case studies from similar clients
  • Performance metrics demonstrating success
  • Examples of strategic alignment with client goals
  • Details of innovations you've implemented and their impact

Make sure your submission is backed by tangible proof.

Don't overlook the importance of governance

Governance is a critical area for the Trust.

They expect company secretarial support, statutory filings and governance advice.

If you can show experience in supporting governance structures effectively, you'll have a strong advantage.

Remember, it's not just about compliance, but also about supporting the Trust's strategic direction.

Consistency over the whole term

This contract could last until December 2032 if extended.

That's a long time to maintain service quality.

I'd explain how I plan to keep standards high throughout the contract duration.

Talk about your strategies for recruitment, training, performance reviews and how you'll handle absences.

Consistency is the hardest thing to deliver, and buyers know it.

One thing I'd keep reminding myself

This contract is all about enabling the Trust to focus on teaching and learning.

Every answer you provide should pass this test: "Does this make life easier for school leaders?"

That's what they're really buying.

Common mistakes

Avoid submissions that:

  • Focus too much on individual service areas and not on integration
  • Lack evidence of past performance or success
  • Use generic language without tailoring to the Trust's specific needs
  • Fail to address the importance of strategic alignment and continuous improvement
  • Ignore the governance requirements
  • Overlook the need for a single accountable management structure
  • Don’t clearly explain how service consistency will be maintained over the term

My Final Thoughts

Big Life Schools is looking for a partner who can provide more than just services.

They want someone who'll help the Trust operate efficiently, safely and sustainably while allowing leaders to focus on education.

With a contract value of £450,000 and a duration of potentially six years, they need to be convinced that your quality will match their expectations.

The emphasis on strategic alignment and innovation means your written submission must clearly demonstrate these capabilities.

Thanks for reading.

I hope this guide has helped make public procurement feel a little less daunting. If it has, then it's done its job.

Kim
Founder, Bid Trawler

P.S. Got a question?

If you've got a question about anything you've read, or you're stuck on a tender, just send me an email.

Whether it's a quick question or you simply need pointing in the right direction, I'm always happy to help if I can.

kim@bidtrawler.com

Ready to decide whether this contract is worth bidding?

View the opportunity on Bid Trawler and access everything you need to make an informed decision, including the full tender information, direct access to the tender documents, the current supplier, who's winning similar contracts, who else may be bidding, buyer intelligence, our exclusive Inside View, your personalised Winnability Score and an AI-powered contract review.

View the Full Contract & Exclusive Inside View on Bid Trawler →
About our "How to Win This Contract" guides

Our guides are written using publicly available procurement information, including contract notices and published tender documents where available. They are designed to help suppliers understand the buyer's likely priorities and think more strategically about their approach. They are not based on any bidder's confidential submission, bespoke bid strategy or non-public procurement information.

More live contract guides

See all guides