NHSWYICB - Leeds Adult Neurodivergence Hub - Single Point of Access

Kim Frater, founder of Bid Trawler
Written by Kim Frater
Former Public Sector Buyer • Founder of Bid Trawler • 40+ years' public sector experience
"I believe public procurement shouldn't be complicated. Every guide I write explains the process in plain English so you can bid with confidence."

3 minute read  •  Updated September 2026

A practical guide to understanding what the buyer really wants and how to build a winning response.

The real focus isn't just access

When you first look at this tender, it seems to be about setting up a Single Point of Access for neurodivergence services.

But the real focus is on integration.

NHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board wants a seamless service that doesn't just provide access, but coordinates effectively across primary care and the third sector.

The contract covers the creation of an all-age Neurodiversity Hub in Leeds.

This includes pathway coordination and needs-led support for individuals, as well as parent carers exploring neurodevelopmental support, such as ADHD and autism.

The challenge isn't just getting people in the door.

It's about ensuring they're directed to the right support across different services.

Think about the end users' experience

If I were evaluating bids, I'd be looking for how the proposed service impacts individuals and their families.

The users of this service will be navigating complex needs.

They'll want reassurance that their journey through the system will be smooth.

What most bidders will write about is the operational mechanics.

But what I'd want to see is a focus on the emotional and practical experience of the end users.

How will you ensure they feel supported?

How will you reduce their anxiety about accessing multiple services?

Don't just promise integration. Show it.

Promises of integration are common.

Evidence is less so.

If you have experience coordinating between primary care and third sector providers, make that clear.

  • Describe specific instances where you've successfully integrated services
  • Share examples of effective partnerships with healthcare and social care providers
  • Provide metrics that demonstrate improved outcomes through integrated pathways

Integration is more than a buzzword. It's the backbone of this contract.

Pay attention to what they say

The notice makes it clear that the service must operate as an "integrated front door function".

This isn't just about access.

It's about ensuring each individual's needs are met promptly and effectively.

I'd focus on demonstrating how your team will act as the front door.

How you'll manage initial contact, ongoing communication and the coordination of care.

The buyer is clear about the importance of a needs-led approach.

Show how your service will adapt to meet diverse and evolving needs.

Think long-term consistency

Holding standards over the entire contract term is crucial.

Consistency is the hardest thing to deliver.

I'd be explaining how you plan to manage staffing, training and quality assurance over the two-year period.

How will you deal with staff turnover or leave?

How will you ensure continuous improvement?

Remember, it's not just about starting strong. It's about maintaining that strength throughout.

Show how you'll make life easier for the Board

Every contract creates work for the client.

The best contractors reduce that workload.

If I were writing this tender, I'd be explaining how my management processes make life easier for NHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board.

How will you streamline reporting?

How will you ensure the Board is always informed but never overwhelmed?

Evidence always beats promises

One thing I noticed when I worked in the public sector was that almost every bidder claimed to deliver an excellent service.

Very few proved it.

If you have evidence, use it.

  • Case studies of similar projects
  • Testimonials from previous clients
  • Performance data showing successful outcomes

One thing I'd keep reminding myself

At the heart of this service are people seeking support for neurodivergence.

I'd keep asking myself:

"How does this decision impact the individuals and families using this service?"

That question should guide every part of your response.

Common mistakes

Avoid submissions that:

  • Focus too much on the mechanics without considering the user experience
  • Promise integration without providing evidence
  • Overlook the importance of a needs-led approach
  • Fail to address long-term consistency
  • Ignore the workload implications for the Board
  • Rely on generic promises rather than specific evidence
  • Neglect the importance of emotional support for service users

My Final Thoughts

This tender isn't just about setting up a service. It's about creating a coordinated, needs-led support system for individuals and families navigating neurodiversity.

With a value of £4,322,107 and a term from 31 March 2027 to 31 March 2029, the emphasis is on quality rather than just price.

Quality will be a significant part of the evaluation.

Your written submission should reflect that.

Thanks for reading.

I hope this guide has helped make public procurement feel a little less daunting. If it has, then it's done its job.

Kim
Founder, Bid Trawler

P.S. Got a question?

If you've got a question about anything you've read, or you're stuck on a tender, just send me an email.

Whether it's a quick question or you simply need pointing in the right direction, I'm always happy to help if I can.

kim@bidtrawler.com

Ready to decide whether this contract is worth bidding?

View the opportunity on Bid Trawler and access everything you need to make an informed decision, including the full tender information, direct access to the tender documents, the current supplier, who's winning similar contracts, who else may be bidding, buyer intelligence, our exclusive Inside View, your personalised Winnability Score and an AI-powered contract review.

View the Full Contract & Exclusive Inside View on Bid Trawler →
About our "How to Win This Contract" guides

Our guides are written using publicly available procurement information, including contract notices and published tender documents where available. They are designed to help suppliers understand the buyer's likely priorities and think more strategically about their approach. They are not based on any bidder's confidential submission, bespoke bid strategy or non-public procurement information.

More live contract guides

See all guides