Integrated Hospitality Technology platform (EPOS, Digital Ordering, Kiosk & CRM Solutions)

Kim Frater, founder of Bid Trawler
Written by Kim Frater
Former Public Sector Buyer • Founder of Bid Trawler • 40+ years' public sector experience
"I believe public procurement shouldn't be complicated. Every guide I write explains the process in plain English so you can bid with confidence."

3 minute read  •  Updated September 2026

A practical guide to understanding what the University of Edinburgh really wants and how to build a winning response.

The biggest clue isn't the technology

When you first look at this tender, you might think it's all about the technology.

EPOS systems, digital ordering, kiosks and CRM solutions.

But that's not what the University of Edinburgh is really buying.

They want a seamless operation across a complex, multi-site catering environment.

Retail, full-service restaurants, bars and hotels — all working together smoothly.

That's a much bigger picture than just the tech itself.

Think about the complexity of their estate

The University isn't just running a single café.

They have a diverse catering estate.

Retail outlets, full-service restaurants, bars and hotels.

Each with its own unique demands.

Your solution needs to be flexible and scalable.

It must adapt to different environments while maintaining consistency.

I'd make sure my proposal shows exactly how my technology can handle this complexity.

Pay attention to what they say

The University is clear about what matters.

They need a solution that is both flexible and scalable.

That tells me they're worried about future growth and changes.

They also mention "efficient operation" — which means they're looking for productivity gains.

I'd highlight how my technology can grow with them and make their operations smoother.

Don't focus solely on the software

Yes, software is a big part of this.

But the hardware is equally important here.

Your hardware must support the software seamlessly.

The University needs a system that doesn't disrupt their daily operations.

If I were proposing this, I'd detail how my hardware integrates smoothly with the software.

Remember the people using the system

It's easy to get caught up in the technical details.

But don't forget about the end users.

Staff across retail, restaurants, bars and hotels will be using this system.

I'd make sure to explain how intuitive and user-friendly my solution is.

Because a complex system that's hard to use won't help anyone.

Evidence always beats promises

One thing I noticed when I worked in the public sector was that almost every bidder promised a seamless integration.

Very few proved it.

If you have evidence, use it.

  • Case studies from similar environments
  • Testimonials from satisfied clients
  • Demonstrations of flexibility and scalability

Show how you'll make life easier for the University

The University is looking for a partner who makes their life easier.

I'd explain how my solution reduces the workload for their staff.

Perhaps through automated processes or streamlined interfaces.

Whatever it is, show them how you'll simplify their operations.

Manage consistency over the entire term

This contract runs for 2160 days.

That's a long time to maintain standards.

I'd focus on how my solution ensures consistency.

Regular updates, robust support and clear communication plans.

Consistency is the hardest thing to deliver and buyers know it.

Common mistakes

Avoid submissions that:

  • Overlook the importance of hardware integration
  • Ignore the diversity of the catering estate
  • Focus too much on the technical specs and not enough on ease of use
  • Fail to provide evidence of flexibility and scalability
  • Neglect to show how you'll support the University over the long term
  • Assume the University will adapt to your system, rather than the other way around

My Final Thoughts

Remember, the University of Edinburgh is looking for a partner.

Not just a technology provider.

They need someone who understands the complexity of their operations and can offer a solution that grows with them.

This contract spans 2160 days, so they need assurance your solution will remain robust and reliable throughout.

If quality and adaptability are what they value most, that's where I'd focus my written submission.

Thanks for reading.

I hope this guide has helped make public procurement feel a little less daunting. If it has, then it's done its job.

Kim
Founder, Bid Trawler

P.S. Got a question?

If you've got a question about anything you've read, or you're stuck on a tender, just send me an email.

Whether it's a quick question or you simply need pointing in the right direction, I'm always happy to help if I can.

kim@bidtrawler.com

Ready to decide whether this contract is worth bidding?

View the opportunity on Bid Trawler and access everything you need to make an informed decision, including the full tender information, direct access to the tender documents, the current supplier, who's winning similar contracts, who else may be bidding, buyer intelligence, our exclusive Inside View, your personalised Winnability Score and an AI-powered contract review.

View the Full Contract & Exclusive Inside View on Bid Trawler →
About our "How to Win This Contract" guides

Our guides are written using publicly available procurement information, including contract notices and published tender documents where available. They are designed to help suppliers understand the buyer's likely priorities and think more strategically about their approach. They are not based on any bidder's confidential submission, bespoke bid strategy or non-public procurement information.

More live contract guides

See all guides