Provision of a Human Resources Information System and Payroll Service

Kim Frater, founder of Bid Trawler
Written by Kim Frater
Former Public Sector Buyer • Founder of Bid Trawler • 40+ years' public sector experience
"I believe public procurement shouldn't be complicated. Every guide I write explains the process in plain English so you can bid with confidence."

2 minute read  •  Updated September 2026

A practical guide to understanding what the buyer really wants and how to build a winning response.

The heart of this tender isn't just software

The David Ross Education Trust isn't just looking for a new HR system.

They're looking for a solution that covers the entire employee lifecycle with ease.

This means supporting 2,200 employees across 36 academies.

From recruitment to retirement, every interaction needs to be seamless, accurate and compliant.

Yes, it's about technology.

But it's really about making life easier for their HR team.

Don't underestimate the importance of integration

Integration is a big deal here.

The Trust needs a system that talks to its existing infrastructure.

Think about secure data exchange and how you'll handle it.

Most bidders will promise integration.

I'd show exactly how it works.

Remember the end users

The end users aren't just the HR team.

They're also the 2,200 employees and managers across the Trust.

They need a user-friendly system.

One where self-service is truly self-explanatory.

If I were evaluating this, I'd want to see clear evidence that real users find your system intuitive.

Show how you support the Trust's in-house payroll team

The Trust will keep running payroll in-house.

That means your solution must fit into their current processes without disruption.

Explain how you'll make payroll easier, not harder.

Highlight how your system supports "accurate, timely and compliant" payroll operations.

Pay attention to what they say

The Trust is clear about their priorities.

Security, data protection, business continuity and disaster recovery are all in there.

They've got a lot on the line.

I'd focus on how your solution keeps their data safe.

Not just in theory, but in practice.

Evidence always beats promises

One thing I noticed when I worked in the public sector was that bidders often speak in generalities.

Try not to do that.

If you've got evidence, use it.

  • Case studies from similar sectors
  • Testimonials from existing clients
  • Demonstrations of the system's capabilities
  • Data showing uptime and reliability

This is what I'd include.

Address ongoing support and service management

A ten-year contract is a long time.

The Trust needs reassurance that support won't wane after the initial rollout.

How will you maintain service standards?

Explain your approach to system updates and service management.

Consistency is key.

Think about the transition

Data migration and testing are big hurdles.

Show how you'll handle this transition smoothly.

The Trust wants assurance that their data will move seamlessly into the new system.

Outline your process for configuration, testing and training.

Common mistakes

Avoid submissions that:

  • Ignore the specifics of the Trust's current HR processes
  • Overlook the need for integration with existing systems
  • Fail to demonstrate user-friendliness for employees and managers
  • Skimp on details about security and data protection measures
  • Neglect the importance of supporting the in-house payroll team
  • Provide generic rather than tailored evidence
  • Underestimate the complexity of data migration
  • Lack clarity on ongoing support and service management

My Final Thoughts

What the David Ross Education Trust is really looking for is confidence.

Confidence that their new HR and payroll system will work seamlessly alongside their existing processes.

With a contract value of £1,600,000 over ten years, there's significant room for quality.

60% of the evaluation is based on quality, so make sure your written submission reflects that.

It's not just about offering a system.

It's about offering a partnership that will last a decade.

Thanks for reading.

I hope this guide has helped make public procurement feel a little less daunting. If it has, then it's done its job.

Kim
Founder, Bid Trawler

P.S. Got a question?

If you've got a question about anything you've read, or you're stuck on a tender, just send me an email.

Whether it's a quick question or you simply need pointing in the right direction, I'm always happy to help if I can.

kim@bidtrawler.com

Ready to decide whether this contract is worth bidding?

View the opportunity on Bid Trawler and access everything you need to make an informed decision, including the full tender information, direct access to the tender documents, the current supplier, who's winning similar contracts, who else may be bidding, buyer intelligence, our exclusive Inside View, your personalised Winnability Score and an AI-powered contract review.

View the Full Contract & Exclusive Inside View on Bid Trawler →
About our "How to Win This Contract" guides

Our guides are written using publicly available procurement information, including contract notices and published tender documents where available. They are designed to help suppliers understand the buyer's likely priorities and think more strategically about their approach. They are not based on any bidder's confidential submission, bespoke bid strategy or non-public procurement information.

More live contract guides

See all guides