PACS Solution for New CT Post-Mortem Service

Kim Frater, founder of Bid Trawler
Written by Kim Frater
Former Public Sector Buyer • Founder of Bid Trawler • 40+ years' public sector experience
"I believe public procurement shouldn't be complicated. Every guide I write explains the process in plain English so you can bid with confidence."

3 minute read  •  Updated September 2026

A practical guide to understanding what the buyer really wants and how to build a winning response.

Think beyond the technical

Yes, you're delivering a PACS solution.

But what West Northamptonshire Council is really buying is peace of mind.

They need a reliable, compliant system to support their new CT post-mortem imaging service. It's about ensuring smooth operations at the newly built County Mortuary.

The contract covers the provision, implementation, support and maintenance of the PACS. It should integrate seamlessly with the Siemens SOMATOM go.Up CT Scanner, meeting all functional and non-functional requirements.

Pay attention to what they say

The Council is clear about their priorities.

They need this service established quickly, with a strong focus on compliance and interoperability.

No legacy systems mean no data migration headaches, but it also means you're building from scratch. They're looking for a partner who can hit the ground running.

Remember the people behind the service

While it's easy to get caught up in technical details, remember who this service supports.

The CT post-mortem service is crucial for providing timely and accurate imaging results. It assists pathologists and forensic teams by streamlining the post-mortem process.

Your solution should make their jobs easier, not harder.

Compliance is non-negotiable

Security, retention and operational compliance are non-negotiable.

These aren't just buzzwords. They're fundamental to running a service like this.

If I were evaluating bids, I'd want to see evidence of your capability in these areas, not just promises. How will you ensure data security and meet retention requirements?

Evidence always beats promises

One thing I noticed when I worked in the public sector was that almost every bidder claimed they could deliver.

Few proved it.

If you have evidence of past successes, use it. Examples might include:

  • Case studies of similar implementations
  • Testimonials from healthcare clients
  • Metrics demonstrating system reliability and user satisfaction
  • Documentation on security measures and compliance processes

Don’t underestimate the importance of support

Implementation is just the beginning.

How you support and maintain the system over the contract term is crucial. Your submission should detail your support strategy, including response times and issue resolution processes.

The Council wants assurance that help is there when needed.

Show your understanding of interoperability

Interoperability is a key theme here.

Your PACS must work seamlessly with the Siemens SOMATOM go.Up CT Scanner. It should also be compatible with other systems the Council might use in the future.

I'd focus on how your solution integrates with existing healthcare technologies and your track record in doing so.

One thing I'd keep reminding myself

This isn't just about technology. It's about trust.

West Northamptonshire Council is placing trust in you to provide a vital service. Every part of your submission should reflect that trustworthiness and reliability.

Common mistakes

Avoid submissions that:

  • Focus solely on technical specifications without addressing operational needs
  • Lack evidence of compliance with security and retention requirements
  • Offer generic support plans with no specifics on response times
  • Ignore the importance of interoperability with existing and future systems
  • Fail to demonstrate experience in similar healthcare implementations
  • Provide vague promises instead of concrete evidence of past successes

My Final Thoughts

West Northamptonshire Council isn't just buying a PACS. They're buying assurance, compliance and support.

With a contract value of £85,000 and a term from 1 November 2026 to 31 October 2028, extendable to 2030, this isn't just a short-term commitment. It's a partnership.

Quality is what will set you apart. Make sure your written submission reflects that, focusing on how you meet their specific needs and priorities.

Thanks for reading.

I hope this guide has helped make public procurement feel a little less daunting. If it has, then it's done its job.

Kim
Founder, Bid Trawler

P.S. Got a question?

If you've got a question about anything you've read, or you're stuck on a tender, just send me an email.

Whether it's a quick question or you simply need pointing in the right direction, I'm always happy to help if I can.

kim@bidtrawler.com

Ready to decide whether this contract is worth bidding?

View the opportunity on Bid Trawler and access everything you need to make an informed decision, including the full tender information, direct access to the tender documents, the current supplier, who's winning similar contracts, who else may be bidding, buyer intelligence, our exclusive Inside View, your personalised Winnability Score and an AI-powered contract review.

View the Full Contract & Exclusive Inside View on Bid Trawler →
About our "How to Win This Contract" guides

Our guides are written using publicly available procurement information, including contract notices and published tender documents where available. They are designed to help suppliers understand the buyer's likely priorities and think more strategically about their approach. They are not based on any bidder's confidential submission, bespoke bid strategy or non-public procurement information.

More live contract guides

See all guides