The Kemnal Academies Trust Tender for Catering Services
A practical guide to understanding what the buyer really wants and how to build a winning response.
Don't just think about food
The Kemnal Academies Trust isn't just looking for someone to serve meals.
They're looking for a partner who can enhance the educational environment across 45 academies.
That's a big responsibility.
From London to Medway, the Trust spans a diverse range of schools with unique needs — 15 secondary and 30 primary academies.
The contract isn't just about providing meals.
It's about delivering a service that supports the health, well-being and learning of students.
Think about the students and their needs
Yes, it's catering.
But at its heart, this tender is about students.
Students need nutritious meals that fuel their ability to learn.
They need variety and quality.
If I were evaluating bids, I'd be looking for how your services will meet the diverse needs of pupils across different age groups.
Secondary students have different tastes and nutritional requirements compared to primary pupils.
Evidence always beats promises
One thing I noticed when I worked in the public sector was that many bidders talk a good game.
But few can back it up.
If you have evidence, use it.
- Testimonials from other educational institutions
- Case studies showing how you've improved student satisfaction
- Nutritional analyses demonstrating the health benefits of your menus
- Data on meal uptake rates before and after your service implementation
These are the things that set you apart.
Pay attention to what they say
The Trust's focus is clear.
They're not just interested in the lowest price.
They want value for money.
That means quality.
They're looking for a contractor who can deliver consistently high-quality meals across all sites.
And with five lots, they're probably looking for someone who can manage complexity.
That's what you need to demonstrate.
Remember the contract length and its implications
This isn't just a short-term commitment.
The initial term is three years, with the potential to extend to five.
The Trust will want to know how you'll maintain standards over that time.
Staffing.
Training.
Innovation.
I'd want to see how you'll keep things fresh and exciting for students over the whole term.
Show how you'll make things easier for the Trust
Every contract creates some level of work for the client.
The best contractors minimise that workload.
If I were writing this tender, I'd explain how my processes and systems make life easier for academy staff.
Think about:
- How you'll handle communication with each academy
- Your approach to managing feedback and complaints
- Your systems for ensuring food safety and compliance
These are the things that matter.
Think about sustainability and local sourcing
More and more, schools are focusing on sustainability.
They want to know where their food comes from.
If you can source locally and demonstrate a commitment to sustainable practices, say so.
Reducing food miles, supporting local farmers and minimising waste can all be powerful differentiators.
Be clear about your approach to TUPE
With a contract this size, there's a strong chance current catering staff will transfer under TUPE regulations.
How you handle this transition will matter.
Clear communication, fair treatment and effective integration plans show you're taking this seriously.
Common mistakes
Avoid submissions that:
- Ignore the individual needs of primary versus secondary academies
- Fail to provide evidence of past success in similar settings
- Overlook the importance of sustainability and local sourcing
- Neglect to address how you'll manage the TUPE process
- Simply promise quality without showing how you'll deliver
- Forget to detail how you'll manage communication across multiple sites
- Assume price is the only factor the Trust cares about
My Final Thoughts
The Kemnal Academies Trust is looking for a partner, not just a supplier.
They're interested in a service that enhances the educational environment across their 45 academies.
With a contract value of £17,244,375 and a potential duration of up to five years, the stakes are high.
Quality matters here.
And with the potential to extend the contract, sustaining that quality over time will be crucial.
That's what I'd focus on in your submission.
Thanks for reading.
I hope this guide has helped make public procurement feel a little less daunting. If it has, then it's done its job.
P.S. Got a question?
If you've got a question about anything you've read, or you're stuck on a tender, just send me an email.
Whether it's a quick question or you simply need pointing in the right direction, I'm always happy to help if I can.
Ready to decide whether this contract is worth bidding?
View the opportunity on Bid Trawler and access everything you need to make an informed decision, including the full tender information, direct access to the tender documents, the current supplier, who's winning similar contracts, who else may be bidding, buyer intelligence, our exclusive Inside View, your personalised Winnability Score and an AI-powered contract review.
View the Full Contract & Exclusive Inside View on Bid Trawler →About our "How to Win This Contract" guides
Our guides are written using publicly available procurement information, including contract notices and published tender documents where available. They are designed to help suppliers understand the buyer's likely priorities and think more strategically about their approach. They are not based on any bidder's confidential submission, bespoke bid strategy or non-public procurement information.