UWTSD2627/244. Minor Works Framework 2026

Written by Kim Frater

Former Public Sector Buyer • Founder of Bid Trawler • 40+ years' public sector experience

"I believe public procurement shouldn't be complicated. Every guide I write explains the process in plain English so you can bid with confidence."

3 minute read  •  Updated August 2026

A practical guide to understanding what the buyer really wants and how to build a winning response.

Think beyond the surface service

When you read the details of this opportunity, it's easy to focus on the practicalities — minor works, reactive maintenance, specialist trade services.

But that's just the surface.

What the University of Wales Trinity Saint David and Pembrokeshire College really want is peace of mind.

They need partners who can keep their facilities running smoothly, without disruption.

The framework covers a wide range of services: from planned maintenance and minor works to urgent repairs and specialist trade services.

But it's your ability to deliver consistent, reliable support across these areas that will set you apart.

Remember what a framework really means

This isn't a contract for a single project.

It's a chance to be on a list of trusted suppliers for up to eight years.

You aren't just competing for a piece of work.

You're competing for a relationship.

Winning a place on this framework means you're trusted to be called upon when the need arises.

But remember, a place on the list doesn't guarantee work.

That's the prize of a call-off contract, which you'll need to win through further competition or direct award.

The importance of consistency

One of the biggest challenges in a long-term framework like this is maintaining standards over time.

Consistent quality is crucial.

Not just in the first year, but throughout the potential eight-year term.

I'd want to see exactly how you plan to manage this.

How will you handle staff turnover?

What's your process for ensuring compliance with standards and regulations?

And how do you plan to monitor and improve performance across different types of work?

Pay attention to what they say

The documents spell out that this framework is about more than just construction.

It's about supporting the "operation, maintenance and improvement" of their estate.

That means you'll need to demonstrate how your services contribute to the overall efficiency and effectiveness of their facilities.

They're looking for a partner who can seamlessly integrate into their existing operations.

That's what I'd build my submission around.

Evidence always beats promises

If I were evaluating bids, I'd be looking for evidence, not just promises.

Prove that you can deliver what you say you will.

Have you handled similar projects before?

Can you provide case studies or testimonials?

Do you have performance metrics that demonstrate your reliability and efficiency?

Here are some examples of evidence you might include:

• Customer testimonials from similar projects
• Case studies with clear outcomes and benefits
• Performance data showing on-time delivery and quality standards
• Accreditation and compliance certificates

Don't overreach with lots

With fourteen lots on offer, it's tempting to apply for as many as possible.

But I'd advise against spreading yourself too thin.

Focus on the areas where you can genuinely deliver the best service.

Geographical coverage varies by lot, so consider where you have the strongest presence and capabilities.

It's better to be exceptional in a few areas than average across many.

Direct award vs further competition

Once you're on the framework, work can be awarded directly or through further competition.

For a direct award, you'll need to be easy to find, sensibly priced and known for reliability.

Further competitions will require quick, tailored responses, often under tight timelines.

Being prepared for both scenarios is key.

Have systems in place to respond promptly and effectively to further competitions.

One thing I'd keep reminding myself

At the heart of this framework are the people who rely on the university's facilities every day.

Students, staff, visitors.

Their experience is what truly matters.

I'd keep asking myself: How does my service make life easier for them?

How does it enhance their environment and support their activities?

That's the ultimate test of any submission.

Common mistakes

Avoid submissions that:

• Focus solely on technical capabilities, ignoring operational integration
• Overpromise on coverage or service areas
• Lack clear evidence of past performance
• Ignore the framework's long-term nature and commitment
• Provide generic responses that don't address the specific needs of the university
• Fail to outline a strategy for maintaining standards over the entire term
• Overlook the importance of emergency and out-of-hours support

My Final Thoughts

Ultimately, the University of Wales Trinity Saint David and Pembrokeshire College are looking for partners they can rely on.

The framework is valued at £23 million over a four-year period, extendable to 2034.

That's a significant commitment.

With the right approach, it represents a fantastic opportunity.

The quality and price weighting of the framework will determine your success in securing a place.

Emphasise consistency, reliability and evidence of past success.

That's what will set your bid apart.