Accommodation-Based Supported Living (Acre Road)
A practical guide to understanding what the buyer really wants and how to build a winning response.
Don't underestimate one word in the title
When I looked at this tender, one word stood out immediately: "Supported".
Yes, it's about accommodation.
But more than that, it's about providing support.
The Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames isn't just looking for someone to manage Hartington House. They're searching for a partner who will deliver meaningful support to adults with learning disabilities and autism support needs.
This contract covers care and support services for a 12-flat supported living scheme. It's a substantial commitment, running for five years with a potential extension to ten.
Focus on the "support" in supported living, and you'll be on the right track.
Remember who you're trying to convince
The end users here are adults with learning disabilities and autism.
What do they need?
Consistency, understanding and respect.
Your response should reflect a deep commitment to these individuals, ensuring their needs are met with dignity and care.
If I were evaluating bids, I'd be looking for responses that show empathy and a genuine understanding of the challenges these residents face.
It's about building trust and rapport, not just providing a service.
Think about what a family worries about
Families want assurance that their loved ones are in good hands.
They worry about safety, communication and the quality of care.
I'd focus my submission on how your team interacts with residents and their families.
What processes do you have in place to ensure families are kept informed?
How do you handle concerns or emergencies?
These are the details that will set your response apart.
Pay attention to what they say
The buyer has made it clear that this is a significant investment.
A £6,150,000 contract over five years, potentially extending to ten, isn't small change.
They're not obliged to accept the lowest price, meaning quality carries weight here.
I'd emphasise how your approach to care and support services ensures value for money without compromising quality.
It's about delivering a service that justifies the investment.
Evidence always beats promises
In my experience, evidence always carries more weight than promises.
The buyer is looking for proof that you can deliver what you promise.
Consider including:
- Testimonials from similar projects
- Case studies demonstrating successful outcomes
- Data on staff retention and training
- Examples of effective communication with residents and families
- Evidence of compliance with relevant regulations
These are the kinds of evidence that will strengthen your submission.
Show how you'll maintain standards over the whole term
Consistency is key, especially over a long-term contract.
The buyer needs confidence that standards won't slip.
Consider how you'll handle staff absences, recruitment and ongoing training.
What systems do you have in place to ensure continuous improvement?
I’d be clear about how you monitor and review performance regularly.
It's about showing you're committed to maintaining high standards throughout the entire contract duration.
One thing I'd keep reminding myself
This isn't just about managing a building.
It's about supporting people.
Every decision, every plan, every process should be geared towards improving the lives of the residents at Hartington House.
If I were writing this tender, I'd keep asking myself: "How does this benefit the residents?"
That's the question that should guide every aspect of your submission.
Common mistakes
Avoid submissions that:
- Focus too much on the accommodation and not enough on the support aspect
- Lack evidence of previous success in similar settings
- Ignore the importance of family communication and involvement
- Fail to demonstrate understanding of the specific needs of adults with learning disabilities and autism
- Over-promise without providing evidence or a clear plan
- Neglect to detail plans for maintaining standards over the contract term
- Assume cost is the primary decision factor without considering quality
My Final Thoughts
The Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames is looking for more than just a service provider. They're seeking a partner who will enhance the lives of residents at Hartington House.
With a contract value of £6,150,000 over five years, extendable to ten, this is a significant commitment. Quality is key and the buyer isn't simply looking for the lowest price.
Your written submission needs to reflect this emphasis on quality — it's what will set you apart.
Thanks for reading.
I hope this guide has helped make public procurement feel a little less daunting. If it has, then it's done its job.
P.S. Got a question?
If you've got a question about anything you've read, or you're stuck on a tender, just send me an email.
Whether it's a quick question or you simply need pointing in the right direction, I'm always happy to help if I can.
Ready to decide whether this contract is worth bidding?
View the opportunity on Bid Trawler and access everything you need to make an informed decision, including the full tender information, direct access to the tender documents, the current supplier, who's winning similar contracts, who else may be bidding, buyer intelligence, our exclusive Inside View, your personalised Winnability Score and an AI-powered contract review.
View the Full Contract & Exclusive Inside View on Bid Trawler →About our "How to Win This Contract" guides
Our guides are written using publicly available procurement information, including contract notices and published tender documents where available. They are designed to help suppliers understand the buyer's likely priorities and think more strategically about their approach. They are not based on any bidder's confidential submission, bespoke bid strategy or non-public procurement information.